PBMA Education Committee Members
|
Chip Howat - Education Committee Chair
Person 2 Person 3 Person 4 Person 5 |
|
Non-Voting PBMA Representatives
Sarah Lamb / Jenny Kallista
Sarah Lamb / Jenny Kallista
TEES Evaluation Process
- A TEES evaluation begins with a self assessment. The self assessment is provided to the education committee who then identifies the most suitable committee candidate (evaluator) for the type of educational training to be evaluated
- An evaluation continues by the evaluator attending / taking the training course as a participant and observer
- The evaluator will participate and compare self assessment goals to the actual learnings as well as evaluate the delivery of content
- The evaluator may conduct a brief survey with a handful of students
- Post evaluation continues with a full committee review of the supplied note and review provided and written by the evaluator, this review is provided in written format via email and confrence call
- The committee reviews the written material prior to their confrence call review, during the call the finalize any question with the evalator and make an approved or not approved vote
- Feedback is given based on the TEES committees broad overview of training programs, educational knowledge and technical background
- Once approved your organization is entitled to utilize the endorsed by PBMA logo which will be emailed along with all evaluation notes and comments
- If unapproved you'll be provided with a plan of action, the committee may need to revisit the training or conduct an exit pole of future students
- The PBMA will publish an annual educational review to the general public as well as host a list of endorsed programs within it's website